Gun laws don't need to be stricter

Self defense , hunting , and collecting. All are all legitimate purposes for owning and carrying a gun. However, pro-gun arguments are actually more complex than this. Gun control laws shouldn’t have to increase just because some a sum amount of people don’t know how to be mature with the way they use or carry walk knowing they either have or conceal a gun illegally . Gun laws then again shouldn’t be more stricter than they already are . Everyone has the right to own a gun. in self defense .

To begin, My reasons behind my opinion are because the second amendment of the US constitution protects individual gun owner ship. The second amendment states itself that , “ A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” While some might argue that this law grants permission for militias to possess guns, not individuals, since there are no such thing as militias anymore, the courts have extended the right to own guns to all people. This was established in part by the Supreme Court Case District of Columbia v. Heller. The bottom line is that gun ownership is an inarguable part of the US law.

Secondly, Gun control laws do not deter crime; gun owner ship deters crime . Laws restricting guns do not make a person one feel safe from an attack. In fact, the opposite is true: , a ownership of a gun protects victims from the attack .

Finally, people have the right to protect themselves. Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self defense and denies a person with a sense of safety. Many laws against guns can reduce the amount of safety which a person feels. As for an example, school teachers can’t protect them selves from school shooters.

My conclusion would be to say that gun laws don’t need to become stricter because then people could have less defense towards others that are trying to hurt them.